Alarmed by the tone "Hard" of Brexit and the economic consequences of the british parliamentary conservative, labour and nationalist scots are demanding the first minister Theresa May vote prior to the application of article 50, which initiates the divorce with Europe, which she announced at the conference conservative for "before the end of march."
The step by british Parliament was a measure which, initially during the referendum of June, he was referred to until the resignation prime minister David Cameron. But she wants to avoid because it only has a majority of 12 mps in the House of Commons, and might lose it. The Lords also would make life challenging, and block the divorce. The legislators warned him that the referendum did not include the access to the single market, that today you are going to lose in a negotiation with the EU if they do not accept parallel the free movement of persons.
The labor governments were the first ones that started the movement to bring the Brexit to the House of Commons. Sir Keir Starmer, secretary of the Brexit in the shade, he demanded that May put to vote in the british Parliament "its proposals for the future access to the single market". He joined the conservative former minister of Cameron, Nicky Morgan, and Ann Soubry next to Nick Clegg, a former deputy prime minister of Cameron, and liberal democrat.They joined the former leader’s Work, Ed Miliband.
Theresa May, until now he refuses."It is just another attempt to find another way to twist the wish of the british people," said a spokesman for Downing St. Sir Keir was felt that the referendum should be accepted but accused the first minister of "maneuver without scrutiny"."The 23 June is not a blank cheque and it will be a disaster if the deputies are not consulted," he warned. For him, the position of Theresa May mean a risk to the economy, jobs, and workers.
This transversality parliamentary in the claim is the greatest danger to the stability of May, which has not been voted on and that is using the referendum as if it were a choice, when she officially was in the ranks of the Remain. The premier reminded that, by a margin of 6 to 1, the british voted in favour of the Brexit that she is looking to implement, but whose conditions are – until now – an absolute mystery.
To make matters worse, the Brexit is broken in its interior, with unpredictable consequences.European governments heard alarmed the new discourse "Hard Brexit" deTheresa May and they hardened all their positions.Many thought that the british arrepentirían of their actions before announcing the divorce. France and Jean-Claude Juncker, the leader of the European Commission, are willing to make to pay to Great Britain the price of "Hard Brexit" to not have to deal with countries that seek to imitate them in the EU.
Theresa May, had to give up after the conference, and the government will no longer require the list of foreign workers in british companies. The scottish nationalists had imputed reminiscent of the nazis. The Remain of his conservative party heard the announcement that the companies were required to declare their foreign employees with alarm and denounced the attitude "entupida and xenophobic".
But the entrepreneurs and industrial british, gathered in the mighty CBI, warned the government that May, "you are running the risk of closing the door to an open economy," with this kind of measures. Many of these captains of industry are conservative and are alarmed at the possibility that the automobile industries are going to Slovakia and banks, to Ireland and Germany to the loss of the "passport" to operate in the EU.
The last 48 hours have been deadly for the Hard Brexit, which she used at the conference conservative for internal consumption. But it was not interpreted in Europe and in the assembly of the IMF in the same way, and the negotiations will be very hard. Monday, May was in Denmark and this week May go to Spain and the Netherlands to look for to get the access to the single market without free movement of people. You will say no.
But there is something even worse: they broke the Brexit from the inside. Steve Hilton, who campaigned for the exit of the European Union and is the former guru of Cameron, said that the plan about the foreigners in companies british was "divisive, nasty and insanamente bureaucratic".
The Chancellor of finance ,Philip Hammond, who voted to continue in Europe, and is now super-minister in May, is being accused within the Brexit "pessimism". It is because it suggested that "the Brexit should tell the british hard truths". Today the brexistas believe that you could even lose your job because you are unsure of the benefits that you might have Great Britain in the negotiation of the single market without free movement of people.
No comments:
Post a Comment