Monday, February 23, 2015

CCOO UGT and CEOE accused of pursuing young, temporary work … – Yahoo Finance Spain

CCOO UGT and CEOE accused of pursuing young, temporary work … – Yahoo Finance Spain

MADRID, 23 (EUROPA PRESS)

CCOO and UGT have countered Monday the draft document of proposals expected to refer the CEOE the Government for the development of the National Reform Plan 2015, and summarizes that, among other things, what it does is “youth work, acausal and cheap “.

In a joint statement, the unions show his” astonishment “at certain proposals of the employers, where they see a search for greater competitiveness through the” precarious “employment,” without a strategy beyond particular interests poor “.

First, the central critical that employers are seeking to recover the contract of employment promotion, created in the mid-80s, which, in his opinion “wishbone served to extend as an oil slick temporary labor to all sectors and businesses.” “It is an absurd and reckless proposal” they say.

The same opinion with the idea of ​​recovering the successive temporary contracts or eliminate the causation of any contracts or work and service, whose character, say the unions, “must be exceptional.”

On the part-time contract that employers want to push, CCOO and UGT consider it “the main route of precarious employment”. The unions say the CEOE wants to promote this mode as a “ultraflexible and cheap” contract, and remember that 64% of workers who sign one of these contracts do not find full-time employment with better conditions.

With regard to training and apprenticeship contracts and practices, the statement said that “the proposed CEOE again make clear that what is intended simply expand the range of economic contracts and descausalizados”.

Finally, unions criticize the insistence of the bosses in a reduction in social security contributions, considering that it is “unnecessary” measure, because the current level of these contributions is below the European average ; “Misleading” because it would not allow generating employment; and “dangerous” because it would divert resources to the Social Security

.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment