Anticorruption supports file the case of the black box cards … – EntornoInteligente

Expansion / Anticorruption considers that it can not attribute any crime by not being administrator of the entity.

The archive Anticorruption Prosecutor has supported the cause of the blackout cards against the former head of the Casa del Rey Rafael Spottorno considering that it can not attribute any crime by not being administrator of the entity and therefore no they had capacity to decide on it.

Legal sources have told Efe that the prosecutor and follows the criteria already established regarding the directors Carlos Vela, Ricardo Morado and John Astorqui, which as Spottorno not belong the Board of Directors or the Supervisory Board and therefore they did not exercise Administrators role the box.

The prosecutor believes that the facts constitute a crime of unfair administration and misappropriation, but you can attribute these four officers, who enjoyed a card for entertainment expenses which itself had a proper use, plus another for personal use to supplement their pay.

Yet , the sources do not exclude that these officers may be deemed participants for profit, something that will have to determine when the investigation is more advanced.

In the letter which was in favor of archive case against Vela, Purple and Astorqui, the representative of the Public Ministry stressed that “one can distinguish the conduct of these defendants, directors of Caja Madrid, the other defendants who had directorships as members of the board or commission Control of the box “.

For the fiscal,” managers, unlike the other defendants received these cards clearly as additional remuneration, as inferred not only from the statements of users and who delivered them, but also the fact that they had another card company is yes representation expenses duly justified. “

In addition, the prosecution stressed that they did not weigh about the same” limitations ” remuneration to which the directors themselves were subjected

With this, the prosecutor amended the thesis defended at the beginning of the

Thus, of the 86 users opaque cards.. – of which 65 were members of the Board and Control Committee, the prosecutor showed at the start of charging only for the 27 directors of unfair administration, but now believes it may also have misappropriated use they gave the members of such Committee.

In line with the arguments of Corruption, former director of the Fundación Caja Madrid called free file performances last March 27 in a letter, which has had access Efe, which argued precisely that he had not been manager of the entity and therefore had “no power of decision.”

“There was certainly administrator of that entity, or management functions or exercising control over it, “thus rejecting that he could impute a crime of unfair administration.

Spottorno explained that had two cards, one for costs of office and other Free provision was delivered “of the heads” of Caja Madrid and that, contrary to the above, it did not justify the expense.

Therefore, he argued that “there was detrimental effect “Caja Madrid and that” there is an obligation to repay “what his visa disbursed 223,900 euros, so you can not impute a crime of misappropriation.

Information Expansion