Madrid, Oct. 7 (EFE) A .- Elpidio Silva José “cared little for the law” and had a “preconceived plan” to “punish” Miguel Blesa all costs for its management of Caja Madrid, which materialized ” inquisitorial manufacturing “operation” “and” delusional “against exbanquero culminating in his imprisonment.
” The defendant knew what he was doing and wanted to do it. It mattered little law, “say two of the three judges of the Superior Court of Justice of Madrid who have Silva sentenced to 17 and a half year ban and a fine of 6,300 euros and 10,000 euros compensation to the president of the CEOE Gerardo Diaz Ferran for moral damages.
Eduardo Beltrán and María Jesús Santos Vijande believe that “had the worst behavior you can make a judge” to prevaricate steadily since he decided to reopen the case in which investigating Blesa and Diaz Ferran by granting a 26.6 million credit Marsans Group in November 2012.
A cause that he had filed nearly two years ago for not appreciating evidence of crime and reopening “against two citizens of their own volition and nothing to justify “to finish in double exbanquero imprisonment justified” unusual reasons “and” delusional “.
” And it does not matter the name and significance of the investigated media, as rules and process guarantees are applicable to any “notes the judgment to be appealed to the Supreme Court by counsel for the accused.
Silva pursued from the beginning a” target “the jailing Miguel Blesa, the first time on bail of 2.5 million in May 2013.
Given that Blesa got paid that amount in less than a day, “he decided to make sure that does not happen again” and again gave one prison two weeks later, but unconditionally without bail under “unusual reasons for their degree of speculation” without taking a decision on the return of the deposit.
In order to fulfill their “preconceived plan “the judge currently on unpaid leave,” a new one built “cause with the purchase of City National Bank of Florida, as there was no chance of imprison the credit.
” No is that there were questionable decisions or mere mistakes, is that it has directed all legal operation inquisitorial court, in order to discover anything that might impute to Blesa and Diaz Ferran, arrogating a limitless powers “he says.
This is how “transmuted the object of the process, transforming what was the initial complaint in a truly general case against Mr. Blesa.”
In this regard, note that the “mere voluntarism” that moved to Silva is credited not only in the “seriousness” of their decisions, but by the “persistence of purpose and preferential treatment” given to Clean Hands, whose lawyers “dispensing facilities access” to his office and who jailed Blesa without the union was duly themselves known.
consider also prevaricating providence in which he ordered, including a bulky battery prosecution, seizure of corporate mailings exbanquero when “measures as invasive” require no motivation is given and which should have been agreed in a car.
In between, months of “silences and tardiness” in resolving appeals continually had the accused and a statement by gag the “only reason” that it was “annoying or irritating the exercise of the right of defense.”
Meanwhile, the president of the panel that judged him, Arturo Beltran issued a dissenting opinion in which Silva defends acquittal, because although the instruction is carried out, “as a whole, extremely irregular” behavior not fit defined in the Penal Code.
“If a behavior as undesirable it can be explained outside the criminal law, the conclusion is to be issued acquittal, “he concludes.
No comments:
Post a Comment