Gestha ensures that Bankia may incur tax offense by … – elEconomista.es

Gestha ensures that Bankia may incur tax offense by … – elEconomista.es

Europa Press

10.02.2014 – 15:16

Note to users: – ( 0 votes)

• On the contrary, there would be no offense for Specifically each manager
• Although itself to possible tax violation would face
• Bankia should have entered the deductions corresponding to the SATA

The Technical Ministry of Finance (Gestha) have warned that Bankia, entity born of the merger of Caja Madrid and six other cases, could have committed tax fraud if he finally shows that the alleged use of credit cards’ B ‘by directors and officers of Caja Madrid was part of undeclared earnings to the Treasury.

In a statement, Gestha explained that in the event that it is established that compensation was not reported, would have entered the relevant withholding state tax agency (AEAT). These deductions were 35% between 2009 and 2011 and 42% in 2012, so that the amounts exceed the threshold of 120,000 euros from tax offenses which already exists.

However, Technical Finance has clarified that there would be no crime in the case of each executive, allegedly because the amounts charged for each of these cards between 2010 and 2012, the only years for which has not yet prescribed tax fraud not reach the threshold of crimes. “They would face a possible tax violation because they have cheated in income tax by not declaring these amounts as income from work,” he added.

But Gestha reminded that it is possible that expenses paid through these cards are considered misappropriation, in which case there would be no tax offense by proceeding this money from illegal activities.

Therefore, the Ministry of Finance Staff have urged that the AEAT start a tax inspection by the income tax from 2010 to 2012 these people to avoid submitting voluntary disclosures and evade the penalty, unless they qualified for the tax amnesty of 2012.

Finally, Gestha expressed his “astonishment” at the alleged abuse with credit cards made by former Caja Madrid, Miguel Blesa, and one of the former directors of the entity and former Secretary of State of Finance, Estanislao Rodríguez Ponga, since both are inspectors of Finance.

“know well the tax legislation and look like they could have taken advantage of loopholes in the functioning and capacity of the Tax Agency to detect some fraud in large companies,” he assured.

ADVERTISING