The National Court Judge Fernando Andreu has indicted 78 other users of the opaque cards (“B”) of Caja Madrid, which thus adding to the presidents Rodrigo Rato, Miguel Blesa and exdirectivo Ildefonso Sánchez Barcoj , and called to testify next February to 27 of them.
At one today reported auto, Andreu convenes for the 16th of this month to 10 of them: José Antonio Moral Santin; José María Arteta; Juan José Azcona; Pedro Bedia; Rodolfo Benito; Gerardo Diaz Ferran; Ramón Espinar; Guillermo R.Marcos; . Gonzalo Pascual and Ignatius Martin Navasqüés
A day later, Jesus Pedroche must appear; Alberto Recarte; José María de la Riva; Antonio Romero; Ricardo Romero de Tejada; Put Estanislao Rodríguez; Francisco Baquero; José Manuel Fernández Norniella; Mercedes Red and Virgilio Zapatero
Finally, on 18 ENEDINA are cited María Álvarez.; Luis Blasco; María del Carmen Cafranga; Arturo Fernandez, Jorge Gómez, Javier López Madrid and José Ricardo Martinez Castro.
In addition, Andreu has decided to call as witnesses on February 20 Terceiro former president Jaime, under whom stood Blesa the origin of the cards; the four exdirectivos never used them, which were Francisco Verdú, Felix Manuel Sánchez, María Iñigo Aldaz and Esteban Tejera, as well as the Corporate Director of Internal Audit Bankia who uncovered the scandal, Iñaki Azaola.
has also called for that day as a witness who was secretary of the Board, Enrique de la Torre, who nevertheless was recipient of a visa to which he loaded 304,818.36 euros.
Elucidating the concept whereby Cards
issued
In its resolution, the “fundamental” is “to clarify the concept by they issued and delivered credit cards, both directors and managers “, hence differentiate between administrators and managers.
Andreu believes there are” serious doubts ” on the basis of the costs incurred by those cards, so you want to make is whether issued as entertainment expenses or in addition to compensation, which would define the crimes alleged unfair administration or misappropriation.
explains in his car, if it was a business card to meet the expenses, does not exist yet written contract or statutory provision or decision of the governing bodies in this regard.
The judge certainly be dealt card company
Remember, too, that ended up returning this type of cards to directors and executives with some completely different to those provided for representation expenses purposes. This became “delivery in an irregular remuneration”, so with a monthly limit by position to occupy your beneficiary, you could have your balance freely, without having to justify the concept for which was available each card.
All this considering that, according to Bankia, with these cards, directors or executives possessed another card company, so I doubt they will try to business cards .
No comments:
Post a Comment