The Supreme Court has endorsed the Redundancy Employment (ERE) agreed Paradores in 2013 whereby he dismissed 350 workers and temporary lay-offs agreed for another 246, plus shorter hours for another 400.
The Works Committee negotiated with the above measures address Paradores of Spain, coming to an agreement signed in January 2013 by UGT and CCOO, but which part of union representation (CGT, CUT and the Committee on Hostal Catholic Monarchs) opposed
.
Now, the Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by CGT and confirmed an earlier judgment of the High Court already had endorsed these agreements, in a statement that the full signature of the Social Chamber.
The Supreme Committee believes that the Company was entitled to Intercentros develop negotiation outside some hostels have their own committee and also that if the conditions were met to justify an employment regulation because, if it had not adopted, the company would come to “a downward spiral that would have seriously jeopardized the continuity of staff and the company.”
The company claimed geometric loss of customers, over 50% in 2012, losses of almost 51.4 million euros between 2010-2012, and reducing the GOP (gross operating profit) by 94% in the last five years.
The state hotel chain began in late 2012 an ERE to the extinction of 644 contracts, the processing of other 867 permanent and part-time discontinuous decommissioning 7 hostels and temporary closure of 27 for a period of five months a year.
In mediation before the SIMA an agreement in January 2013, signed by the 92,95% representation was reached labor and UGT and CCOO, in which the number of contract terminations decreased from 644 to 350, with the possibility of voluntary accessions, which benefited 172 workers.
In addition, a suspension was agreed storm that struck 246 employees and reducing annual workday another 400 by 25%, reducing to a single hostel definitive closure, the Puerto Lumbreras.
The CGT union, CUT and Committee Hostal Reyes Catholics sued by collective dismissal against the company and the unions signed the agreement which was rejected by the High Court.
Later, the CGT appealed, claiming, among other ends, some of the centers as the Parador de Santiago de Compostela had collective agreement itself, so that the works council had no standing to negotiate on that field and that freedom of association was violated by ERE affected by a current collective agreement.
No comments:
Post a Comment